The Cambridge dictionary defines the adjective ‘cold-eye’ as not showing emotion. While this is true of the cold eye reviewer, they are not emotionally attached to the activity, it does not mean they are unfriendly, the alternative definition. At Coking.com, we are emotionally attached to coker people and want to make the industry as safe and reliability (by extension profitable) as possible. We are passionate about seeing every plant, project, and piece of equipment reach its ultimate potential. To achieve this goal, we advocate the use of cold-eye reviews by our objective, 3rd party experts.
Cold Eye Reviews (CER) are called many names such as independent project analysis (IPR), quality control (by discipline, ex. electrical), or peer reviews but they all contain the same fundamental objective. The CER can provide critical information to the project or operations teams and enable them to improve. The CER can and should be used as all phases of the project delivery process from project definition, front-end loading, detailed design, construction, or commissioning. The concept can extend to existing plant operations. The process can be as short as 2-3 days or 2-3 weeks depending on the level of depth required.
If you would like to know more about how our CER services can bring value to your project or plant, please contact us at info@coking.com.
Learn more about
Coking field services, consulting and training

Coker Best Practices and Lessons Learned

Best Practices for Coker Operations

Best Practices for Coker Maintenance

Best Practices for Coker Design

Training for Delayed Coking Engineer

Training for Coker Maintenance

Coker Industry Lessons Learned

Cold Eyes review of coker equipment, projects, procedures and operations

Process Hazard Analysis (PHA) and HAZOP Subject Matter Experts for Delayed Coker

Coker startup and commissioning support

Coker Turnaround / Shutdown Support

Troubleshooting your coker

Incident Investigation Subject Matter Experts







